Henan Business Daily (Chief reporter Sun Kewen/Figure) On April 23, Henan Provincial Higher People’s Court held a press conference. At the press conference, Si Xiaosen, the president of the Henan Provincial High People’s Court, notified 2019 Typical cases of judicial protection of intellectual property in Henan Court.
According to reports, Guangdong Camel Clothing Co., Ltd. has a number of registered trademarks such as “camel”, and its “camel” brand series products have a high popularity in the domestic market.
On May 7, 2019, the company used an outdoor products Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Trading Co., Ltd., and Zhongshan Summary Co., Ltd. to use the same or similar trademark on the production infringing products that are similar to their registered trademarks. The company sells the controlled infringing products. A certain outdoor products Co., Ltd. and Quanzhou Trading Co., Ltd. also use the word “camel” in the company name as the company name as the company’s name as a corporate name to the court to court.
The first instance of the Zhengzhou Intermediate People’s Court determined that a certain outdoor products Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Trading Co., Ltd., and Zhongshan A Technology Group Co., Ltd. constituted an infringement of registered trademark rights. Infringement. An outdoor supplies Co., Ltd. and Quanzhou Trading Co., Ltd. use the word “camel” in the name of Guangdong Camel Club Co., Ltd. as an enterprise name to form an improper competition.
Ordering a certain outdoor products Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Trading Co., Ltd., Zhongshan A Technology Group Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou Trading Co., Ltd. to stop the production and sell the trademark rights of Guangdong Camel Clothing Co., Ltd., a certain outdoor products Co., Ltd. The company’s name is changed and compensated 3 million yuan. The court of the second instance maintained the judgment.
Si Xiaosen said that when enterprises encounter “bearing brands” and “car cars”, they can protect their legitimate rights and interests through trademark infringement and improper competition lawsuits. This case, as a typical case that involves a high market awareness and corporate name protection, is seriously protected by the infringer infringement of the trademark right and knows that the company’s corporate size has a high reputation but still register the text content in the company name of the corporate company as the name of the corporate company as the name of the company’s corporate name as the name content of the company’s corporate name as the content of the name of the corporate name of others as the name content of the company’s corporate name as the content of the name of the corporate name of others as the name content of the company’s corporate name as the content of the name of the corporate name of others as the content of the name of the corporate name of others as the content of the name of the corporate name of others as the content of the name of the corporate name of the corporate as the name of the corporate name of others as the name content of the name of the corporate company as the name of the company as the name of the company as the name of the corporate name. In the case of unfair competition in the font size, the legal compensation amount is increased. It has played a demonstration and guidance for establishing a fair competition order, promoting a virtuous cycle of market economy, and curbing the phenomenon of “brand names” and “car cars”.